The Colonial Legacy
The British Connection and the Colonial Foundation of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
The British Mandate in Palestine (1920–1948) was a pivotal period, shaped by geopolitical ambitions, colonial policies, and the growing conflict between Zionists and Palestinians. While Britain claimed to be preparing Palestine for independence, its policies instead deepened divisions, sowing tensions that still echo today. This pattern of colonial influence, which left unresolved conflicts and open wounds, can be seen in many other regions where colonial powers withdrew without addressing the underlying issues.
The consequences
The 1917 Balfour Declaration, in which Britain expressed support for a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, became the foundation for the British Mandate. It reflected British imperial interests rather than the democratic aspirations of the people living in Palestine, as Britain sought to secure a strategic foothold in the Middle East. While the declaration included a clause stipulating that "nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities," the actual implementation of British policies frequently favored the Zionist movement over Palestinian interests.
The declaration's ambiguity set the stage for conflicting interpretations. To Zionists, it signaled Britain’s endorsement of their aspiration for a Jewish state. To Palestinians, it represented a betrayal, as Britain ignored their majority status and right to self-determination. The Balfour Declaration thus initiated a process of dislocation for Palestinians, who increasingly found their land and political rights undermined.
Favoring Zionist Interests
During the British Mandate, Britain created policies that helped Jewish people move to Palestine and buy land, in response to the Zionist movement's call for a "return to the land." Jewish immigration grew, especially as anti-Semitism and Nazi persecution in Europe forced many Jews to flee to Palestine. The British authorities allowed these newcomers to buy land more easily, often at the cost of local Palestinian farmers, who lost their land because of economic pressure and strict land laws.
British land policies often ignored the traditional ways Palestinians held land, instead supporting Western-style property rights that made it easier for Zionist groups to buy land. Many Palestinians, who didn't have official documents for their land, lost it to absentee landowners and Zionist organizations. This loss of land caused an agricultural crisis, leaving rural Palestinians poorer and forcing many into crowded city areas or into exile. By 1936, Jewish landholdings had grown significantly, while Palestinian land shrank, deepening the gap between the two communities and increasing Palestinian frustration with British rule..
Early Palestinian Resistance
As Jewish immigration increased and Palestinians lost more land, Palestinian leaders and citizens began to push back against British policies that they saw as unfair and supportive of Zionist goals. Resistance grew through strikes, petitions, and protests, particularly in cities like Jaffa, Jerusalem, and Haifa. These peaceful demonstrations were met with harsh British responses, including military crackdowns, mass arrests, and the deportation of key Palestinian leaders.
During the 1936–39 Arab Revolt, for example, British forces used brutal tactics like demolishing homes, detaining large numbers of people, and executing leaders to stop the uprising. This violent reaction not only worsened Palestinian anger but also highlighted Britain's strong support for Zionist aims. However, Britain’s actions were as much about pursuing its own colonial ambitions in the region—aiming to maintain control and secure its interests in the Middle East—as they were about supporting Zionist goal.
Cultural and Societal Impact
The British Mandate policies had a deep and lasting impact on Palestinian society, both in terms of politics and culture. These policies created an environment in which Zionist institutions were able to grow and succeed, often at the expense of Palestinian identity and heritage. While Jewish cultural institutions received strong support from the British authorities, Palestinian cultural expressions were largely suppressed. The British promoted the use of the Hebrew language and Zionist symbols in public places, while Arabic and other elements of Palestinian culture were pushed aside. This cultural favoritism made it difficult for Palestinians to maintain and celebrate their heritage. The British also contributed to significant imbalance in education. While Zionist schools received government funding and support, Palestinian schools were largely ignored. This lack of support led to a growing gap in literacy and education between Jews and Palestinians. As a result, Palestinians had fewer opportunities to improve their social and economic standing. These educational inequalities created long-term barriers to success for many Palestinians, further entrenching their marginalization in society.
A less visible but deeply significant effect of British policies in Palestine was the systematic erasure of Palestinian cultural heritage. The British authorities often ignored or minimized Palestinian contributions to the land’s history, instead promoting narratives that supported Zionist goals. This was reflected in official documents, street names, and place names, many of which were changed from Arabic to Hebrew, effectively rewriting the region's cultural landscape. Palestinians saw their historical connection to the land being downplayed, as public spaces and cultural landmarks were renamed or repurposed, stripping away visible signs of Palestinian identity. This erasure extended beyond physical changes; it also had a profound psychological effect on Palestinian society, diminishing their sense of historical continuity and their feeling of belonging to the land.
Struggle for Cultural Preservation
This cultural suppression, along with the physical displacement, contributed to the long-lasting damage to Palestinian identity. The sense of being pushed out and silenced in their own homeland was not just about losing land—it was about losing a connection to their history, culture, and sense of self. This pattern of repression continued under both British and Israeli rule, with Palestinians continuously fighting to preserve their heritage and identity in the face of external pressures.
The British Mandate laid the groundwork for what would become a longer struggle for the Palestinians—not just against British colonialism, but also against the Israeli state's ongoing efforts to erase their presence and cultural identity. The fight to preserve Palestinian heritage, land, and identity became a defining feature of Palestinian resistance, first against British policies and now against the ongoing Israeli occupation, marking a long history of struggle for self-determination and recognition. This battle to maintain cultural integrity and historical memory remains central to Palestinian identity today.
All articles on Diaspora Dialogue are free to read for one year from publication. If you’ve enjoyed this piece and would like to support my work, you can do so by buying me a coffee. Thank you for reading and being part of the dialogue!
